Front Street Environmental Assessment Study

Country:

Canada

City/Locality:

Ontario

Notice/Contract Number:

can:153037

Publication Date:

Jun 26, 2008

Deadline:

Jul 12, 2008

Buyer:

City of Toronto

Original Language:

English

Address:

Tina Mann

Canada

Telephone:

(416)338-5584

93000000 - Miscellaneous services

Front Street Environmental Assessment Study

Commodity: Professional Services, Consulting services
Description: Front Street Environmental Assessment Study
The purpose of this RFP is to select a qualified contracted professional urban design and transportation consultant team to carry out a Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Study for the re-configuration of Front Street West from Bay Street to York Street that best addresses the planning, operational and urban design objectives as envisioned in the Union Station District Plan.
Issue date: June 19, 2008 Closing date: July 11, 2008
at 12:00 Noon

Buyer: Mann, Tina Phone number: 416-397-4805
Email: tmann@toronto.ca Location: City Hall, 17th Floor West Tower
Client Division: Transportation Services

Non-refundable document fee:
$25.00

Scope of work:
The purpose of this RFP is to select a qualified contracted professional urban design and transportation consultant team to carry out a Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Study for the re-configuration of Front Street West from Bay Street to York Street that best addresses the planning, operational and urban design objectives as envisioned in the Union Station District Plan.

The EA Study is to be conducted in accordance with the Municipal Class EA document of October 2000, as amended in 2007. Given the magnitude of the work, it is anticipated that the EA Study will be carried out in accordance with the requirements for Schedule “C” projects.

2.1 Background

Enhancement of Union Station's public transportation attributes is a priority for the City of Toronto. Union Station functions as Toronto's primary transportation hub for commuters on GO Transit regional rail and bus services and the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) subway and Harbourfront Light Rail Transit (HLRT). The station is also used by VIA Rail, Amtrak, and Ontario Northlander passenger rail services. Every year, Union Station handles more passengers than all three terminals at Pearson International Airport, Canada's busiest airport. As of 2007, the station handled:

 50 million GO Transit rail and bus passengers
 20 million TTC subway passengers
 2.3 million VIA Rail passengers

Every business day, Union Station serves more than 155,000 GO Transit rail passengers and 10,000 bus passengers. This number is expected to significantly increase over the next 20 years as GO Transit’s expansion programs are realized.

Considering that all transit passengers are ultimately pedestrians, appropriate pedestrian planning principles and objectives were developed at the outset of the latest revitalization initiative to ensure that pedestrian circulation is maintained or improved to accommodate current and projected flows in a safe and efficient manner. In consultation with a Station Operator’s Committee (comprising GO Transit, VIA Rail and the TTC) and the Union Station Revitalization Public Advisory Group (USRPAG) a document outlining the existing pedestrian policy directions, principles and objectives was produced as a background document for the Union Station Master Plan. The Pedestrian Planning Policy and Objectives document brings together a cohesive policy framework for pedestrian planning and provides specific principles and objectives for the station building and for the immediate area surrounding the station.

The higher level policy directions are derived from the City of Toronto Official Plan (November 2002) and the Toronto Pedestrian Charter (May 2002) and provide general guidance to the development of Union Station as a pedestrian facility:

 Union Station will be refurbished and its passenger handling capacity expanded;

 A program of street improvements will be developed to enhance the pedestrian environment and measures undertaken to make it safer to walk and cycle in the downtown area;

 An urban environment and infrastructure will be created that encourages and supports walking throughout the City through policies and practices that ensure safe, direct, comfortable, attractive and convenient pedestrian conditions.

In addition, the USRPAG noted the connection between economic vitality and walking and suggested the development of a “Pedestrian Sensitive Area” to underline the importance of pedestrian activities in the vicinity of the station.

It should be noted that the new Toronto Official Plan has had an important influence on how transportation planning matters are approached within the City. One of the main objectives of the Official Plan is to take a more comprehensive approach that links land use and transportation planning policies to create an effective strategy for accommodating the City’s future trip growth in a way that reduces auto-dependency by making transit, cycling and walking more attractive alternatives. This new approach is increasingly reflected in the City’s guidelines, programs and practices which promotes walking as a mode that encourages both health and transportation benefits – cornerstones of comprehensive City building.

The Union Station Master Plan

Toronto City Council adopted the Union Station Master Plan (Master Plan) in December 2004. The Master Plan is a bold, visionary roadmap for the restoration, revitalization and operation of the Union Station complex. As a high-level policy document it is intended to direct decision making for Union Station as it continues to evolve.

The Master Plan advocates for strong pedestrian connections leading to, through and from the Station. The Master Plan effectively reiterates and reorganizes a number of the existing policy directions and objectives as outlined above and includes input received from the USRPAG and others during the consultation process of developing the Master Plan. The Master Plan also defines the need for additional studies that are to be undertaken to help improve the overall pedestrian conditions /amenities both within the station and its environs.

The Union Station District Plan

When the Master Plan was approved, City Council directed staff to undertake an urban design study and to determine whether the area around Union Station warranted designation as a Heritage Conservation District. As a result a study was undertaken that included a heritage conservation district study, associated transportation work and an urban design plan for the are surrounding Union Station that is referred to as The Union Station District Plan (District Plan) Toronto City Council adopted the District Plan in June 2006.

The District Plan provides an opportunity to advance pedestrian issues in the vicinity of Union Station. It provides a vision for Union Station that integrates the historic character of the area while allowing the district to thrive as a multi-modal transportation hub. The District Plan acts as a catalyst for urban improvement by:

 Delineating a Union Station Heritage Conservation District – clear guidelines for preserving and enhancing the historic character of the area

 Developing an improved public realm – shifts the design focus to the pedestrian sphere; and

 Enhancing connections and flow – acknowledges the multi modal and multi-directional “hub” that Union Station has become.

The District Plan sets out a number of guiding principles for the public realm that are intended to enhance and improve the pedestrian environment and better integrate the heritage and transportation requirements into the fabric of the downtown by improving pedestrian connectivity, enhancing pedestrian crossings and improving north-west PATH connectivity.

An important recommendation of the District Plan is the consideration for the creation of a pedestrian priority zone, which could encompass an area covering several City blocks around the Station that is designed and operated in a manner that signals to drivers that they are passing through a primarily pedestrian realm. The priority zone would include pedestrian infrastructure elements, amenities and treatments that would give a higher measure of awareness, and inform drivers that they should be prepared to slow down or stop for pedestrians in this area – this type of zone does not necessarily segregate motor vehicles and pedestrians.

The District Plan identifies the redesign of Front Street, from Bay Street to York Street, as a priority whose guiding principle is as follows:

“To reconfigure Front Street to expand the public realm and support hierarchy of uses”

To this end 14 redesign alternatives were developed and evaluated with four of these alternatives being carried forward for further development and evaluation.

With regard to the redesign of this section of Front Street, the TTC is undertaking the construction of a second platform at Union Station, which is referred to as the Union Subway Station Second Platform and Concourse Improvements Project. This affords the City with an opportunity to undertake work pertaining to the redesign of Front Street in coordination with this TTC project, thereby minimizing construction costs and disturbances to users of Front Street. Thus the Front Street re-design study will have to coordinate with the TTC project.

2.2 Study Purpose

The purpose of this study is to complete a Schedule C Municipal Class EA to reconfigure the portion of Front Street West from Bay Street to York Street in a manner that best addresses the planning, operational and urban design objectives defined in the District Plan. The District Plan provides a grand vision for Union Station that includes improvements to Front Street that are based on the reinstatement of a monumental civic pedestrian realm from building face to building face. The reconfiguration of Front Street is intended to enhance the pedestrian realm including an opportunity to consider the “creation of a pedestrian priority zone”.

As identified in the Union Station District Plan, the proposed improvements to Front Street West are based primarily on the reinstatement of a monumental civic pedestrian realm from building face to building face, with a guiding principle being the primacy of pedestrian activity. The reconfiguration of Front Street would result in a primarily enhanced pedestrian realm allowing for better coordination of all transportation modes including taxis, passenger pick-up and drop-off areas for both private and transit vehicles, and enhancing the cycling environment along this section of Front Street. In addition, it involves providing safe and appropriate access for both maintenance and emergency vehicles, and it needs to accommodate the City of Toronto’s traffic engineering requirements and road design standards. Finally, it involves enhancing the pedestrian realm at the intersections of Bay Street and Front Street West and York Street and Front Street West.

Increasing pedestrian activity in the Union Station District must be addressed and as such, mid-block crossing and the ratios of pedestrians to vehicles should be assessed in non-traditional ways.

2.3 Study Area

The focus of this study is the portion of Front Street from Bay Street to York Street. However, the geographic limits for the purpose of undertaking a traffic systems/network analysis are broader, encompassing an area generally bounded by Richmond Street to the north, Lake Shore Boulevard to the south, Spadina Avenue to the west, and Church Street to the east.

The successful Proponent may be required to further refine the Study limits based on their understanding of the technical (transportation, urban design, heritage and other divisional) needs of the work.

3.0 SCOPE OF WORK

The Consultant’s Proposal will form the basis for the work program and the agreement between the City and the Consultant. The proposal submission should address requirements as outlined in this section – Scope of Work.

3.1 Study Design
The first step in the study will be the preparation of a Study Design. This document will be a refinement of the Proposal submitted in response to this RFP. The Study Design will define in detail the scope and work schedule of the study and will form the basis for the Agreement between the City of Toronto and the Consultant. A Technical Advisory Committee, the membership of which is described in Section 3.12 of this document, will review the Study Design. The Consultant should allow for two iterations of the Study Design before it is finalized.

3.2 Data Collection
In addition to the information to be provided by the City (itemized in Section 3.13), the Consultant will be responsible for the collection, organization, documentation and interpretation of appropriate data including, but not limited to:
Background Information
i) review of all relevant background information and studies, including the Union Station Master Plan, the Union Station District Plan, Pedestrian Studies/Data, Union Station Parking and Loading Study, the Lower Bay Street Pedestrian Promenade Plan, the York Street Pedestrian Promenade Plan, the Environmental Study Report for the Northwest PATH Connection (Union Station to Wellington Street), Union Subway Station Second Platform and Concourse Improvements Project, and relevant urban design, cultural and transportation policies contained in the Official Plan, Secondary Plans, etc.

Physical Environment
i) Summary of the impact of approved and planned future development in the area, including the transportation-related improvements required as a condition of development approvals;

ii) Inventory of existing conditions (physical, social, natural and economic environments) including affected private property and existing infrastructure;

iii) Contact with relevant utilities to obtain location of existing plant, and future plans;

iv) Confirmation of validity of all mapping and structural plans;

v) Geotechnical/engineering data for the affected area; and

vi) Inventory of existing heritage features and surrounding cultural landscape.

Operating Environment
i) Summary of the existing traffic volumes from the City’s 2002 to 2007 traffic data should be used to represent existing conditions.

ii) Summary of the existing pedestrian and cyclist volumes 2002 to 2007 traffic data should be used to represent existing conditions.

iii) The City of Toronto will provide the traffic counts described above as well as current traffic signal timings.

iv) Additional counts/observations of mid-block pedestrian activity, pick-up/drop-off, and loading activity. The Consultant should bear in mind that the pedestrian activity in this section of Front Street is unusual in that there is significant pedestrian activity that occurs mid-block, in addition to via intersections;

v) The City will also provide the consultant with the baseline travel demand volumes derived from the regional GTA Travel Demand Model. These will be applied to the analysis of each of the alternatives. Any additional information, including other/current traffic counts, origin/destinations surveys, site visits and observations required to realistically represent the existing operating conditions and complete the traffic analysis should be collected by the Consultant.

vi) The Consultant will contact other relevant external organizations to establish existing service and future plans, including, but not limited to, GO Transit, VIA Rail Canada and the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC).

vii) The City will make available the last 3 years of collision information and will provide this information in a tabular format. The City will not release any information that contravenes the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act. The analysis of collision information should be in sufficient enough detail to identify any safety or operational concerns including pedestrians & cyclists and TTC operations.

The proponent should clearly identify in the proposal the data and data collection methods necessary to complete this assignment. .
The following background material is available for review during the time period in which the interested consulting firms are preparing Proposals:

• Union Station Master Plan (2004) – www.toronto.ca/union_station

• Union Station District Plan (2006) - www.toronto.ca/union_station

• Phase 1 – License Plate Trace and Pick-up/Drop-off Summary for the Union Station District Plan (2006) – Entra Consultants

• Accessibility Design Guidelines (2004) - http://www.toronto.ca/diversity/pdf/accessibility_design_guidelines.pdf

• Street Furniture Placement Guidelines (draft June 2006) – http://www.toronto.ca/involved/projects/streetfurniture/pdf/council_decision_2006-07-25-26-27_attachment.pdf

• Toronto’s Inventory of Heritage Properties - http://app.toronto.ca/heritage/main.do

• Toronto Official Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/planning/official_plan/introduction.htm)

• Toronto Bike Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/cycling/bikeplan /index.htm)

• Union Station Pedestrian Movement Study - Phase 1 (December 2004)

• Union Station Pedestrian Movement Study - Phase 2 (October 2006)

• Union Station Pedestrian Circulation Plan

• Environmental Study Report for the Northwest Path Connection (Union Station to Wellington Street)

• Union Subway Station Second Platform and Concourse Improvements Project

• Wet Weather Flow Master Plan -http://www.toronto.ca/involved/projects/archived/wwwfmmp_archive/index.htm
Please contact Uwe Mader at 416-392-8479 to set up an appointment to review these materials.

3.3 Data Analysis

The consultant will be responsible for:
i) identifying existing traffic operations, pedestrian and cyclist activity, pick-up/drop-off and loading activity and safety concerns within the study area;

ii) developing and applying detailed sub-area future traffic demands and patterns based on known developments and supportable estimates of background traffic growth;

iv) identifying any future traffic deficiencies within the study area for the existing road network, including a transportation system-wide assessment to determine the broader impacts of traffic redistribution that may occur as a result of the options under study;

v) analyses and simulation of the operation of existing intersections are to be carried out using the Synchro/SimTraffic software package (latest version);

iv) confirmation of validity of all mapping; and

v) submission of a Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment, in compliance with the Ministry of Culture’s Archaeological Assessment Technical Guidelines dated 1993, on the subject property to support determinations of archaeological potential and recommendations for further assessment. The cost of a Stage II Archaeological Assessment should be identified as an optional additional cost.
The Proponent should confirm the data analysis requirements in the Proposal, including the rationale for selecting specific techniques and any additional requirements to those listed above. As noted previously, the Consultant should bear in mind that the pedestrian activity in this section of Front Street is unusual in that there is significant pedestrian activity that occurs mid-block, in addition to via intersections.

3.4 Problem Statement and Needs Assessment
Based on the previous work conducted for the revitalization of Union Station, including the Master Plan and District Plan, and the additional assessment and analysis to be undertaken by the Consultant, a clear problem and/or opportunity statement will be developed. This problem/opportunity statement must establish the need and justification for undertaking any physical modifications as well as the magnitude of such modifications.
Technical Memo No. 1 will be prepared at this point summarizing the existing conditions and problem and/or opportunity statement.

3.5 Identification and Evaluation of Alternative Solutions

Based upon the identification of needs and the problem statement the Consultant shall develop a reasonable range of alternatives at a very preliminary level of detail. These should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the 14 alternative solutions identified in the District Plan. Regarding the movement of pedestrians, at surface and below surface alternatives should be identified and/or taken into consideration.

The alternative solutions are to be evaluated using appropriate criteria to identify a preferred alternative solution. Evaluation criteria will be developed in consultation with the TAC within the following broad categories, including but not limited to: Transportation, Land Use/Urban Design, Socio-Economic Environment, Natural Environment, Cultural or Heritage Environment, and Cost.
Technical Memo No. 2, documenting the identification and evaluation of alternative solutions and the identification of a technically preferred alternative solution will be prepared at this point before the first Public Information Centre (PIC No. 1).

3.6 Development of Alternative Design Concepts
Alternative designs will be developed for the preferred alternative solution. Designs should be developed in sufficient detail to establish the potential physical and operational impacts, to identify and develop suitable mitigating measures, and to establish a comprehensive cost estimate. This should include the identification of all property requirements, urban design requirements, the identification of all utility impacts, impacts on connecting roads, storm water management and any other impacts on the existing conditions.
For analysis at the intersections, the consultant will assess the effects of changes in road capacity, and traffic level of service (i.e. delays) at intersection locations. Analysis of the alternative concepts shall be such as to provide detailed snapshots of expected traffic operations under different roadway design and operational scenarios being considered (including impacts at intersections and on connecting roadways). The Consultant is required to identify the software application or methodologies chosen for the analysis in their proposal.
Urban design, ‘place making’ and historical appropriateness will be an integral component to this study. The urban design objectives and the Heritage Conservation District Plan identified in the Union Station District Plan will form the basis for this work.
It should be noted that the “triangular” parcel of property located at the north-west corner of the intersection of University Avenue and Front Street West is subject to special urban design considerations. It is viewed as a significant point of entry to University Avenue and the City’s financial and institutional district. The design process should explore the opportunities that this ‘gateway’ site presents in terms of:
• promoting high quality urban design to improve the attractiveness and safety;

• signaling to drivers and pedestrians that they have arrived at a distinct place;

• improving the configuration of the island and accommodating enhanced streetscape /landscape treatment and the better pedestrian circulation; and,

• increasing visual quality of the space and considering public art installation.

This intersection is a heavily traveled and a very high profile location, therefore subject to wide public exposure and influence. The design requires a very thorough treatment that engages and enlists public support and presents a visible symbol of design excellence.
Adequate time should be allotted to account for iterations in the development and refinement of the alternative designs, both during the evaluation process and in response to the review by the Technical Advisory Committee and comments received through the public consultation process. These designs should be developed at a scale of 1:200.

3.7 Evaluation of Alternative Design Concepts
This stage should begin with the selection of appropriate engineering and environmental criteria for comparison of the alternative designs including meeting criteria in the Wet Weather Flow Master Plan. Each alternative should be assessed in terms of their transportation benefit, as well as their impacts on the existing and future physical environment, and comparing the alternatives to the “Do Nothing” scenario. The factors should include, but not be limited to:
Transportation and Urban Design
• accommodate pedestrian demand (sidewalk widths/intersection treatments);

• improve street crossings/amenity for pedestrians;

• existing and future traffic level of service;

• existing and future traffic flow patterns on a system-wide basis for the surrounding area;

• overall safety;

• accommodate cyclists;

• accommodate Taxi Waiting areas, Pick-Up/Drop-Off and loading activities;

• meet minimum geometric standards for roadway design elements;

• ability to coordinate with other transit initiatives (e.g. GO Transit, TTC second platform, PATH expansions): and,

• transit impacts.

Socio-Economic Environment
• changes in access;

• impacts on existing residents/businesses/schools and on proposed developments;

• effects on the special needs of residents, businesses (Royal York Fairmont Hotel), and services (police & fire);

• aesthetics (urban design);

• property requirements; and

• ability to accommodate large pedestrian volumes resulting from tourism / recreation events at nearby locals (i.e. Air Canada Centre, Skydome)
Natural

• ability to meet criteria in the Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan;
• vegetation;

• habitat (wildlife); and

• air quality.
Cultural
• archaeological resources;

• heritage objectives – as per District Plan’s Heritage Conservation District document; and

• built heritage features.

Engineering and Costs
• utility relocation costs;

• capital costs;

• opportunities to coordinate construction schedules with other infrastructure projects in the area:

• property acquisition/business loss costs; and

• construction feasibility and staging.

Technical Memo No.3 documenting the development and evaluation of alternative design concepts will be prepared at this point prior to the 2nd PIC.

3.8 Preferred Alternative Design

The preferred alternative design is to be refined based on comments received from PIC No. 2 with appropriate mitigating measures to address any physical and operational impacts, any required maintenance or repair, staging of work and a breakdown of the cost estimate.
The Consultant shall identify all approvals and permits required for the preferred alternative including any CEAA requirements. The Consultant shall also submit a Heritage Impact Statement, if applicable, in compliance with the Toronto Development Guide dated May 2004 to address the built heritage and surrounding cultural landscape.

3.9 Public Consultation

Public consultation will be an integral component of this Study. The City of Toronto’s Public Consultation Unit will lead the public consultation component of this study; however, the ability of the Consultant Team to communicate well with the public is critical. The Consultant will provide City staff with technical support at all public and stakeholder meetings. Based on standards developed by the Public Consultation Unit, this support is to include:

• preparation of display boards and drawings;

• preparation of handout materials;

• preparation of presentations (i.e. slides, Power Point);

• compiling minutes and notes on issues raised at the Information Centers; and

• attendance by technical experts at all meetings to present technical issues and/or answer technical questions.

All materials prepared by the Consultant will be reviewed by the TAC prior to being finalized for public review. To allow sufficient time for the TAC to review and revisions completed, all displays and technical materials should be drafted at least three (3) weeks prior to the planned date for a public meeting.

3.10 Project Meetings

For the purpose of budgeting it is assumed that the following meetings will be a part of the public consultation program:

• ten (10) meetings with individual interest groups, ratepayers and property owners, as required;

• six (6) meetings with affected agencies (TTC, etc);

• 2 Public Information Centers;

• 2 meetings with City of Toronto Council/Committees; and

• 3 contingency meetings.
The above meetings are in addition to meetings with the Project Team and the Technical Advisory Committee. An appropriate number of meetings with the Project Team and Technical Advisory Committee should be included in the work program. A rationale should be provided for the number of meetings chosen and the timing of the meetings within the study schedule. The Consultant will organize, prepare agendas and all necessary materials, attend and minute all meetings of the Project Team and Technical Advisory Committee. Minutes are due no later than one week after the meeting.

3.11 Deliverables

The main deliverables of this assignment are:

• 3 technical memos will be prepared as follows:
No. 1 - Problem Statement and Needs Assessment;
No. 2 - Identification and Evaluation of Alternative Solutions;
No. 3 - Evaluation of Alternative Design Concepts, Refinement of Preferred Design and Identification of Mitigating Measures;

 60 copies of the Environmental Study Report (ESR) that will document the study process and will conform to the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment and which shall include the following elements:

• a clear and concise description of the work undertaken, the alternative solutions and designs developed and evaluated, leading to the selection of the preferred alternative solution and preliminary design;

• a detailed cost estimate for the preferred design including design assumptions and unit costs;

• all technical data collected, results of various analyses, correspondence with the public, agencies, business owners, comments received at PICs and responses to them shall be included as Appendices; and

• functional plans, profiles, property protection plans and any other drawings at an appropriate scale.

• 60 copies of the Executive Summary;

• any materials, displays or presentations required for Public Information Centers;

• MS Word document and PDF format of the ESR;

• one unbound “camera-ready” copy of the final report; and

• digital plans of the preferred design alternative at a scale of 1:500; all plans shall be created using CAD technology and shall be submitted on compact discs in Microstation Version J, Intergraph Design File Format (.DGN).
The Consultant should also allow for a sufficient number of draft documents as well as sufficient time in the schedule for City staff to review the above reports prior to final documents being produced.

3.12 Organization

Uwe Mader (416-392-8479) of the Infrastructure Planning Unit will manage the project for the Transportation Services Division. The Project Team will consist of the City Transportation Project Manager, Project Manager/Task Leaders from the consultant team and other key City staff as determined by the Project Manager. A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will be formed and may consist of City Staff from Transportation Services, Technical Services, Toronto Water, City Planning, Facilities and Real Estate, Corporate Security, TTC, GO Transit, VIA Rail Canada, Union Station Revitalization Team and Transit Security. The Consultant will organize, prepare agendas and all necessary materials, attend and minute all TAC meetings.

3.13 Items / Services Provided by the City

The City of Toronto will:

• provide available traffic and pedestrian data;

• provide information on recently approved developments and/or land use projections as may be required;

• provide baseline travel demand volumes;

• provide base mapping for the parameters as described in the Study Area;
• provide access to Motor Vehicle Accident Records;

• provide unit cost information for construction cost estimates and land acquisition cost estimates;

• correspond directly with all government review agencies and members of the public with technical input from Proponent;

• provide liaison by the City Project Manager who will act as the main point of contact for all information requests on the project from internal/external stakeholders and the media; and

• lead the Public Consultation component of this study with staff from the City of Toronto’s Public Consultation and Community Outreach Unit. This includes directly arranging and paying for:

• all costs associated with the printing and distribution of flyers;

• the placement of newspaper advertisements;

• the booking of venues for public meetings; and

• chairing and facilitating public meetings.

Please visit http://www.toronto.ca/tenders/index.htm
for additional information.

MERX asks that you contact the buying
agency directly to obtain associated documents.
The contact information can be found within
the notice abstract.

Original notice

Front Street Environmental Assessment Study

Request For Proposals

General Information

Contact Information

Goods, Works and Services

Original Text

dgMarket - Tenders and consulting opportunities worldwide